Marriage at Cana San Giorgio Maggiore
The scene is broken down into 3 horizontal areas. The forground contains the feast itself, with Christ and Mary in the center, barely noticeable in the center surrounded by tantalizing dishes of food, animals, and countless vignettes of earthly revelry. The higher terrace, as separated by a balustrade, features more figures engaging in acts of revelry. In the background sits a campanile (bell-tower with or without multiple bells inside) against a vibrant blue sky, as is expected in a Veronese piece.
For a piece that is meant to be religious in nature, very little emphasis is placed on Christ and Mary. They easily blend into the crowd; only differentiated by slight halos. None of the figures seem to pay much attention, if any, to the miracle that is taking place. Veronese himself can be seen playing a viola, paying no attention to Christ. Perhaps this is his commentary on his position on the importance of religion.
It seems that Veronese was more interested in painting and decoration than religious messages being elevated in his work. In fact it seems that luxurious materials and indulgent consumption of food and drink is elevated above all else by Veronese's spectacle of color and attention to detail in the ornate clothing and still life depiction of the meal itself.
Hartt, Frederick, and David Wilkins. History of Italian Renaissance Art. 7th. London: Prentice Hall, 2011. Print.
http://smarthistory.khanacademy.org/veroneses-feast-in-the-house-of-levi.html
ReplyDeleteStormy, link your "Levi" story to this "Smarthistory" site which includes a transcript of the trial and a video with discussion of the painting!
How fortunate you are to have seen this magnificent work.
ReplyDeleteThank you! I just posted again about "Feast in the House of Levi" in regard to that video. It helped me contextualize the piece quite a bit. I'm going to seek out similar videos for future entries.
ReplyDeleteCJ Mealer- Yes! I wish I had the interest I have in art history now when I saw it, but c'est la vie. Also, it seems very out of context in its current surroundings, but I believe many things in the Louvre are. Thanks Napolean.
I think my favorite refectory painting was his rendition of the last supper, that i think was given the nick name feast in the house of levi. Im impressed with his ability to adapt such a large space so appropriate perspectives can be achieved from different angles of observation. from readings i guess is approach was either unconventional or uncommon. his canvases were so fast that different perspectives and vantage points were employed to ensure and more natural impression of the piece.
ReplyDelete